DrJustin
Total posts: 200
12/8/2006 4:26 PM
I know what he is trying to do but his proof is all wrong. 0^0 does not equal 0/0. but i think the real winners of the whole thing are those kids they are hosed.
mike
Total posts: 2298
12/9/2006 10:00 AM
Don't worry guys Gohkan is working on the problem. Iiii'm not sure I can translate what he's saying from mathanese into english but he said he'd work on it. I think right now he's saying that it's plausible in the manner that i is plausible but the complex plane behaves very well (e.g. all complex polynomials have roots etc) and this guy would have to do a lot of work to show that the nullity 'algebraeic field' was a legitimate one
mike
Total posts: 2298
12/9/2006 10:00 AM
whoop now he's saying its not a
field.
mike
Total posts: 2298
12/9/2006 10:00 AM
whoop now he's changing his mind
maybe i'll make him post
mike
Total posts: 2298
12/9/2006 10:13 AM
wait he says its not beacuse in fields zero times any number has to be zero in a field
mwinter
Total posts: 4337
12/9/2006 10:33 AM
In response to Oscar's recording of Verizon ppl.. wow. just wow.
Drew
Total posts: 5121
12/9/2006 11:26 AM
Indeed that verizon call was amazing.
Here's his blogI especially like the
google converter link he sent them in an email.
Oscar
Total posts: 1323
12/9/2006 11:26 AM
is it really that surprising after all this nullity nonsense though? :P
Drew
Total posts: 5121
12/9/2006 11:27 AM
They're probably related.
mike
Total posts: 2298
12/9/2006 12:43 PM
ytmnd shortens the audio to about 1 minute. :-D